The 2016 Rolex 24 at Daytona, held from January 30th to 31st, was a thrilling and unpredictable race, showcasing the intense competition and endurance required to conquer this iconic event. While we can't provide live, real-time results for a past race (like the 2016 Rolex 24), this article will delve into the key aspects of that race, offering a comprehensive retrospective analysis and highlighting the significance of its outcome within the context of the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. We will also address the user's request for information regarding future Rolex 24 races, acknowledging the impossibility of providing results for events that haven't yet occurred. The categories listed (Rolex 24 2025 results today; Rolex 24 results 2025; Rolex 2025 results; Rolex 24 results today; Rolex 24 results by class; 2025 daytona 24 hours results; Rolex 24 2025 standings; Rolex 24 current standings) all pertain to future races and therefore cannot be answered definitively.
Recap of the 2016 Rolex 24 at Daytona:
The 2016 Rolex 24 was a battleground for some of the most prestigious teams and drivers in endurance racing. The race featured intense battles across multiple classes, with lead changes happening frequently throughout the grueling 24-hour period. The unpredictable nature of Daytona International Speedway, with its high-speed banking and challenging infield section, contributed significantly to the drama. Weather conditions often play a crucial role, and 2016 was no exception, potentially influencing strategy and creating opportunities for some while hindering others.
Overall Race Summary:
The overall victory in 2016 went to the #60 Michael Shank Racing Ligier JS P2-Honda, driven by a stellar lineup including Colin Braun, Oswaldo Negri Jr., John Pew, and Mike Conway. Their victory was a testament to their consistent pace, strategic pit stops, and flawless driver changes throughout the race. The team's performance was exemplary, highlighting the importance of teamwork and meticulous preparation in such a demanding race. Their margin of victory, while needing specific data retrieval from race archives, undoubtedly reflected a strong and consistent performance over the entire 24 hours.
Class-by-Class Breakdown (2016):
To fully appreciate the 2016 Rolex 24, it's essential to look at the results across different classes. While precise finishing positions and times require referencing official race results from IMSA, a general overview can be provided:
* Prototype (P): As mentioned, the #60 Michael Shank Racing entry dominated the Prototype class. This class featured the fastest and most technologically advanced cars, making their victory even more impressive. The battle for second and third place likely involved intense competition, with various teams showcasing their capabilities and pushing the limits of their machinery.
* Prototype Challenge (PC): The Prototype Challenge class usually featured less powerful but still highly competitive prototypes. The fight for the class win in 2016 would have been a closely contested affair, with teams vying for the top spot. Examining the race results would reveal the specific winning team and the drivers who contributed to their success.
current url：https://adrzuq.k748s.com/products/rolex-24-results-2016-14057